Goallover.org is a not for profit site dedicated to encouraging internet users to make regular and more varied donations to charities. It takes less than 5 minutes to decide which of our partners to support, so we hope you pick one, click through, and sign up today.
Government Marine Conservation Zones won’t offer seabirds protection
The RSPB has been angered by the revelation that a list of species and habitats that will form the basis for newly established Marine Conservation Zones (MCZs) around the UK does not include any seabirds.
The UK Government has committed to putting a network of MCZs in place by 2012. In England, the job of identifying areas of sea to be designated falls to regional panels, which will make their decisions based on guidance from Natural England and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
This guidance has just been published and lists those species and habitats that should be taken into account when identifying MCZs and no seabirds are in the published lists.
This means that while other wildlife and their habitats will be protected by law, the waters used by hundreds of thousands of birds will remain at risk from damage and exploitation.
Kate Tanner, Marine Policy Officer at the RSPB, said: “This decision seems utterly incredible. We were delighted when the Marine Act became law last year after more than a decade of campaigning by the RSPB and other conservation organisations.”
“It seemed our seas and the wildlife they support would finally get legal protection from a network of new Marine Conservation Zones. To find out seabirds will not be properly protected will come as a huge blow to our many members who campaigned so hard in the belief that birds would benefit.”
While most of the UK’s seabird colonies on land enjoy legal protection, there is no such protection for the waters adjacent to the colonies, where the birds bathe and preen to maintain condition.
The birds’ feeding grounds further out to sea are also currently unprotected and it is areas such as this where seabirds are particularly vulnerable to bycatch, in which they are accidentally caught and killed as a result of human fishing activity.
The RSPB has produced a map of sites believed to be vital to nationally important seabird colonies.
Any future network of sites protected by European law would not cover these areas, something which Kate Tanner believes the government have been unaware of:
“The Government seems to think our seabirds will be covered by the European network of Special Protection Areas. Well, there are two big problems with that. First, we don’t have a network of marine SPAs in the UK. We were meant to have a complete network of them back in 1981. Almost 30 years later we have just one, with plans for two more announced last year.
“Second, even if we get a proper network of marine SPAs, they will only offer protection to waters used by internationally important numbers of seabirds or which support internationally important seabird colonies.”
Tanner felt that overlooking seabirds in the MCZs undermines their whole purpose, as it leaves a gaping hole in the UK’s conservation measures that could have been easily achieved by merely including them in this new protection scheme.